free hosting   image hosting   hosting reseller   online album   e-shop   famous people 
Free Website Templates
Free Installer



History of the Mohawk Palatines Relating to the Christman Family


Which Constitution Did Bush & Obama Swear To Defend?

USA Constitution vs CSA Constitution

FROM: Article 1 Section 8

For those of you who do not know, both constitutions are very similar. The difference is this: The Confederate Constitution is a British version. The British Empire was our enemy in the American Revolution, remember?

The following comparison of Article 1 Section 8 of the two constitutions clearly shows the difference between "American System" Economics & British "Free Trade". For a complete comparison of the two constitutions CLICK HERE.

(USA) Section. 8. (CSA) Sec. 8. The Congress shall have power COMMENTS
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; (1) To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises for revenue, necessary to pay the debts, provide for the common defense, and carry on the Government of the Confederate States; but no bounties shall be granted from the Treasury; nor shall any duties or taxes on importations from foreign nations be laid to promote or foster any branch of industry; and all duties, imposts, and excises shall be uniform throughout the Confederate States.

In the CSA constitution Section 8 has an official title: "Congress shall have the power", where as in the original it's much less organized.

The Confederates didn't mention "providing for the common defense" in their constitution's preamble, but they do here. "General welfare" is still omitted, however.

The CSA also makes a point that their government will not pay bounties (unlike the US government, which often paid bounties to soldiers, especially during the Civil War).

Lastly, the CSA essentially bans trade protectionism by saying that tariffs cannot be imposed on foreign goods for the sole purpose of protecting local industry. Southerners had often been prevented from buying cheaper foreign goods because of Yankee protectionist measures.

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States; (2) To borrow money on the credit of the Confederate States. No changes.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; (3) To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes; but neither this, nor any other clause contained in the Constitution, shall ever be construed to delegate the power to Congress to appropriate money for any internal improvement intended to facilitate commerce; except for the purpose of furnishing lights, beacons, and buoys, and other aids to navigation upon the coasts, and the improvement of harbors and the removing of obstructions in river navigation; in all which cases such duties shall be laid on the navigation facilitated thereby as may be necessary to pay the costs and expenses thereof.

The Confederates added a ton here.

The changes forbid Congress from spending money to "facilitate commerce." This can be seen as an early attempt to limit the power of big business in politics; Congress was only supposed to fund infrastructure that served the interests of the states and the people, not industry.

The only exception granted is for harbors and other waterway infrastructure. Sea-based trade was the Confederacy's big hope for financial survival.

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; (4) To establish uniform laws of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies, throughout the Confederate States; but no law of Congress shall discharge any debt contracted before the passage of the same. Clarification: Congress cannot declare its own debts null and void.


Consider Today's America

Consider the fact that the manufacturing industry in America has been destroyed by design, that corporations have moved to other countries, and consider that we have been flooded with cheap imports and cheap illegal (slave) labor that few Americans can compete with. Consider the results of financial de-regulation and modern banker fraud that points directly to "The City of London" and "Wall Street". Consider the fact that at the recent G20 summit in London, Gordon Brown and Obama both spoke against "A Return to Protectionism" and promoted "Globalism"; which, is just the nice "new way" to say "British Free Trade" and "Colonialism". Please consider those facts with the comparison of the two constitutions. And now consider these questions:

Which constitution do we really have now? Isn't it true that the American economy today more closely resembles the economy of the Confederate constitution?

If that's true, then who really won the Civil War?

Or how about this thought: Who really won the American Revolution?

Which constitution did they swear to uphold and defend, anyway? In my opinion it isn't the one that my ancestors fought and died for.

Unreal, isn't it?

And one final thought about Bush and Obama: Could it be possible that a eagle has a left wing and a right wing and BOTH wings are controlled by the same brain? In other words: Is it possible that BOTH the Republicans and Democrats are controlled by - The City of London and their lacky's on Wall Street whether they realize it or not?

Isn't it obvious?

Africa


Watch these two videos about how returning to "American System" Economics could completely transform the continents of Africa and North America.

LPACTV: The Future of Africa

LPACTV: The Future of the Americas


Last updated 12.4.2009